The City of Buffalo has initiated legal proceedings to seize the long-vacant Buffalo Grand Hotel, citing mounting public health concerns, code violations, and more than a year of unpaid taxes. Acting Mayor Michael Scanlon announced the filing this week, triggering a 30-day window for the hotel’s owner, Harry Stinson, to respond.

Located in downtown Buffalo, the Buffalo Grand Hotel has stood empty for nearly four years. Once a bustling hospitality venue, the property has since fallen into disrepair, prompting city officials to pursue legal measures aimed at reclaiming the site for potential public use.

“The city has an obligation to protect the health and safety of its residents,” Acting Mayor Scanlon said, emphasizing that taking control of the hotel is necessary to address the ongoing issues tied to its prolonged vacancy.

The legal filing marks the latest development in a protracted standoff between city officials and the hotel’s ownership. According to municipal records, the property has accumulated significant code violations and tax delinquencies, raising alarms about its impact on the surrounding neighborhood.

Hotel owner Harry Stinson has pushed back against the city’s claims, stating that he is actively seeking refinancing options to restore the property. Stinson disputes the city’s characterization of the situation and maintains that efforts are underway to bring the hotel back into operation.

Despite these assertions, city leaders remain skeptical. Mayor-elect Sean Ryan, who will soon take office, voiced support for the legal action, stating that resolving the issue is in the community’s best interest. Ryan underscored the importance of finding a path forward that brings the property back into productive use.

Communication between Stinson and city officials has reportedly been inconsistent, further complicating the situation. While the owner insists on progress with refinancing, the city has grown increasingly concerned over the prolonged lack of activity and the deteriorating condition of the building.

As the legal process unfolds, the next step rests with Stinson, who has 30 days to respond to the city’s notice. If no resolution is reached, the city may proceed with efforts to assume control of the property.